Reasons for Paper Rejection

Apr 19, 2025 Lecture 10 6 min read

Research Methods

Share this Notes:

Twitter

Facebook

Understanding the causes behind paper rejections is essential for academic success. Reviewers often look for reasons to reject rather than to accept a paper. The most common reasons include:

1. Lack of Prior Work Referencing

Failure to cite relevant prior work—especially your own similar publications—can lead to instant rejection. Academic integrity requires acknowledgment of related contributions, and editors often use search tools to check for overlaps.

2. Low Novelty

If a paper closely resembles previous work or fails to contribute something technically new, it will be considered redundant and rejected. Novelty is a cornerstone of publication standards.

3. Not Being State-of-the-Art

Papers presenting results that are merely “comparable” to existing research fail to meet the bar. Reviewers expect improvements or new insights—not repetitions of known outcomes.

4. Unsupported Claims

Any claim—especially performance-related ones (e.g., faster, more efficient, less memory)—must be supported with experimental or simulation evidence. Unsupported statements lead to credibility loss and rejection.

5. Incomplete Methodology

A well-written paper should allow another researcher to replicate the results. All important technical details—dimensions, materials, algorithms, formulas—must be fully disclosed.

6. Poor Grammar and Language

Incorrect grammar, unclear sentences, or awkward phrasing make comprehension difficult. Even good ideas can be dismissed due to poor presentation in English.

🧮 Writing Algorithms in Research Papers

In computer science research, algorithm design often represents the main contribution. The quality and clarity of how algorithms are written directly affect paper evaluation.

🔹 Essential Qualities of a Good Algorithm

Worthwhile Contribution: Clearly define the problem, inputs, and expected outputs.
Soundness: The algorithm should not produce incorrect results.
Completeness: It must handle all valid inputs—excluding none without justification.
Correctness: The output must match the expected behavior as per the specification.

🔹 Presenting Algorithms Properly

Step-by-Step Explanation: Describe each step clearly along with inputs, outputs, and data structures used.
Correctness Demonstration: Use proofs, loop invariants, or pre/post-conditions.
Cost Analysis: Provide time and space complexity.
Experimental Validation: Include test cases, simulations, or real-world datasets to support claims.
Scope and Limitations: Clearly state where the algorithm applies and its known boundaries.

🔹 Presentation Formats

List Format: Sequentially numbered steps; good for walkthroughs.
Pseudocode: Preferred for clarity and universality; avoids language-specific syntax.
Mathematical Notation: Use standard symbols (e.g., × instead of *) for clarity and professionalism.

📊 Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research

Research methods broadly fall into two types, each with distinct characteristics and goals.

🔍 Qualitative Research

Focuses on understanding experiences, perspectives, and meanings through non-numerical data.

Data: Text, interviews, videos, observations.
Methods: Case studies, interviews, focus groups, thematic/documentary analysis.
Analysis: Interpretive, narrative, thematic.
Sample Size: Small, deeply explored.
Goal: Explore why and how phenomena occur.
Example: Studying trauma survivors through in-depth interviews.

📈 Quantitative Research

Aims to measure and test hypotheses using numerical data.

Data: Surveys, experimental results, databases.
Methods: Statistical analysis (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA, regression).
Analysis: Numerical and mathematical.
Sample Size: Large, generalizable.
Goal: Determine what, how much, and how often.
Example: Measuring drug effectiveness through controlled experiments.

Key Differences

Feature	Qualitative	Quantitative
Data	Non-numerical (text, observations)	Numerical (statistics, counts)
Goal	Understanding, exploration	Measuring, testing hypotheses
Analysis	Interpretive, thematic	Statistical methods
Sample Size	Small, focused	Large, representative
Methods	Interviews, observations	Surveys, experiments

Examples of Methods

Qualitative

Interviews: Personal insights; structured around a research question.
Focus Groups: Group perspectives; observe dynamics and collective views.
Documentary Analysis: Examines texts (e.g., diaries, records) for layered meanings.

Quantitative

Surveys: Collect broad numerical data; easy and cost-effective.
Existing Databases: Leverage pre-coded large datasets.
Experiments: Apply interventions and track outcomes using statistical tools.

Understanding Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Methods, Examples, and Real-World Applications

Qualitative and quantitative research are two foundational approaches in academic and professional inquiry, each with distinct methods, goals, and applications. Qualitative research focuses on understanding experiences, behaviors, and social contexts through non-numerical data such as interviews, focus groups, or observations. For instance, a researcher studying patient satisfaction in hospitals might conduct in-depth interviews to explore how patients feel about the care they received, uncovering emotional or cultural factors that surveys might miss. In real life, qualitative research is often used in product development to understand how users interact with a prototype or in education to explore how students experience online learning.

In contrast, quantitative research aims to measure and analyze variables using numerical data and statistical tools. It seeks to test hypotheses, establish relationships, or make predictions. A common example would be surveying 1,000 customers to determine how many prefer a specific product feature, then analyzing the results using statistical methods. In real-world settings, quantitative research is used by governments to collect census data, by health organizations to evaluate drug effectiveness in clinical trials, and by businesses to track consumer behavior trends. Together, these methods offer complementary insights—qualitative research tells us why and how, while quantitative research tells us what and how much.

🔍 Evaluating Research Quality

🔹 Qualitative Research

Are the research questions clear and methods appropriate?
- Good qualitative research starts with well-defined, open-ended questions that align with interpretive methods such as interviews or observations.
- The method (e.g., narrative, ethnography, case study) should match the aim of exploring complex human experiences or social phenomena.
Are conclusions grounded in the data?
- Findings must be directly supported by data collected (quotes, field notes, themes).
- There should be a transparent link between participant responses and interpretations made by the researcher.
Are themes logically constructed and researcher biases addressed?
- Thematic coding must follow a logical process, usually backed by coding frameworks.
- Researchers should disclose potential biases and reflect on their influence on the analysis (reflexivity).

🔹 Quantitative Research

Is the chosen method (survey, experiment) suitable for the research?
- The research method must match the research objective: surveys for broad trends, experiments for causal relationships.
- Appropriateness depends on whether the method can effectively test the hypothesis.
Is the sample size sufficient and representative?
- The sample should be large enough to achieve statistical power.
- It should also represent the population being studied to ensure findings can be generalized.
Are the findings statistically valid and well-analyzed?
- The use of proper statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA, regression) is crucial.
- Data must be clean, and assumptions of statistical tests must be met; conclusions must be supported by p-values, confidence intervals, or effect sizes.