Stop the Presses: Convex Is Here… And So Are the Growing Pains
Ah yes, Convex. The backend equivalent of sliced bread—at least according to the tech hype machine. You’ve seen it. YouTube tutorials swooning. X (formerly Twitter) threads declaring it the One True BaaS™ for web and AI alike. Blog posts throwing around words like “game-changer” and “magic”. So, naturally, when I landed a shiny new gig as a Full-Stack Software Engineer and got the task of building an onboarding flow, I thought: “Why not lean into the hype?”
So I did.
I spun up a nice little Next.js frontend, connected it with Convex for the backend, tossed Clerk into the mix for authentication, and let my AI copilots help with the heavy lifting. Fast-forward a few hours and a few too many coffees, and what I had was a codebase so pristine it could hang in a modern art museum. Every mutation lived in its own file. The UI clicked at endpoints like clockwork.
Piece of cake, right?
HAHAHA. (Cue the screaming.)
The Calm Before the Storm
I presented the app to my manager. The response? “Wow, this is great!” Everyone loved the sleek dashboard and smooth UX. We made a few tweaks, but nothing major. The vibe was optimistic.
Then came July 20th, 2025 at 12 AM—deployment time. And you know what? Everything actually worked. For a few days.
In just 12 hours, 200 users signed up. I watched the data stream in, jaw on the floor. It was like watching fireworks on New Year’s—except these fireworks were my backend APIs exploding in real-time.
The Happy Story Ends
Traffic kept climbing. 500+ users online at once. And then… the issues began.
The Problem:
Client-side errors. Performance drops. Broken components.
But here’s the kicker: No errors in the logs. Zero. Nada. The system looked fine, but it was slowly dying inside.
So, I did what any engineer would do—meetings, debugging, late-night Slack rants, and more debugging.
Eventually, the culprit revealed itself:
Convex cache was hitting max capacity. Constantly. And once it hit 100%, the application just… broke.
The Original Code: What Went Wrong?
Here’s the original getLeaderboard
function that led us down this rabbit hole:
export const getLeaderboard = query({
args: {
limit: v.number(),
skip: v.number(),
country: v.optional(v.string()),
},
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
const maxProcessLimit = 1000;
const processingLimit = Math.min(args.limit + args.skip + 100, maxProcessLimit);
let query = ctx.db.query("users");
if (args.country) {
query = query.filter((q) => q.eq(q.field("country"), args.country));
}
const users = await query.take(processingLimit);
const sortedUsers = users
.map((user) => ({
userId: user.userId,
name: user.name,
profileImage: user.profileImage,
country: user.country,
totalPoints: Object.values(user.pointsBreakdown).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0),
directReferralCount: user.directReferralCount,
}))
.sort(
(a, b) =>
b.totalPoints - a.totalPoints ||
b.directReferralCount - a.directReferralCount
)
.slice(args.skip, args.skip + args.limit);
const totalUsers = await ctx.db.query("users").collect();
const totalCount = args.country
? totalUsers.filter(u => u.country === args.country).length
: totalUsers.length;
return {
leaderboard: sortedUsers,
total: Math.min(totalCount, maxProcessLimit),
hasMore: args.skip + args.limit < Math.min(totalCount, maxProcessLimit),
pagination: {
limit: args.limit,
skip: args.skip,
nextSkip: args.skip + args.limit < totalCount ? args.skip + args.limit : null,
},
};
},
});
This code worked beautifully—for a demo. But in production, with real traffic? Not so much.
Why it failed:
collect()
pulls everything into memory. That’s like trying to drink from a firehose because you’re a little thirsty.- No pagination safeguards.
- Heavy client-side computation.
- No caching optimization.
The Rewrite: Optimized and Cache-Friendly
So I rewrote the function. Introducing the new and improved getLeaderboard
:
export const getLeaderboard = query({
args: {
limit: v.number(),
skip: v.number(),
country: v.optional(v.string()),
},
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
const safeLimit = Math.min(args.limit, 50);
const safeSkip = Math.max(0, args.skip);
// Try to get precomputed leaderboard first
const precomputed = await ctx.db
.query("precomputedStats")
.withIndex("by_type_country", (q) =>
q.eq("statType", "leaderboard").eq("country", args.country || "global")
)
.first();
if (precomputed && Date.now() - precomputed.updatedAt < 300000) {
const data = precomputed.data as any[];
const sliced = data.slice(safeSkip, safeSkip + safeLimit);
return {
leaderboard: sliced,
total: data.length,
hasMore: safeSkip + safeLimit < data.length,
pagination: {
limit: safeLimit,
skip: safeSkip,
nextSkip: safeSkip + safeLimit < data.length ? safeSkip + safeLimit : null,
},
fromCache: true,
};
}
// Fallback: Live DB fetch with index
let query = ctx.db.query("users").withIndex("by_createdAt");
if (args.country) {
query = query.filter((q) => q.eq(q.field("country"), args.country));
}
const fetchLimit = Math.min(safeLimit + safeSkip + 20, 100);
const users = await query.take(fetchLimit);
const processedUsers = users
.filter(user => !user.email.startsWith("DEACTIVATED_"))
.map((user) => ({
userId: user.userId,
name: user.name,
profileImage: user.profileImage,
country: user.country,
totalPoints: Object.values(user.pointsBreakdown).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0),
directReferralCount: user.directReferralCount,
}))
.sort((a, b) => b.totalPoints - a.totalPoints || b.directReferralCount - a.directReferralCount);
const sliced = processedUsers.slice(safeSkip, safeSkip + safeLimit);
return {
leaderboard: sliced,
total: processedUsers.length,
hasMore: safeSkip + safeLimit < processedUsers.length,
pagination: {
limit: safeLimit,
skip: safeSkip,
nextSkip: safeSkip + safeLimit < processedUsers.length ? safeSkip + safeLimit : null,
},
fromCache: false,
};
},
});
Why This Works Better:
✅ Safe pagination with hard limits ✅ Precomputed leaderboard support (with 5-minute TTL) ✅ No collect()
—goodbye memory blowups ✅ Index-based querying ✅ Filters deactivated users ✅ Graceful fallback logic
But even with all these improvements… the question remains:
How much can you actually cache before you need to refresh it?
Spoiler: A lot, but not everything. And certainly not forever.
The Real Pain
This was one function. I’ve got dozens more: completeMiniGame
, getAllUsers
, etc.—all screaming for optimization and cache sanity.
And the worst part? Support is… nonexistent. I’ve reached out on Discord. Sent emails. Nothing. I’m hoping someone from the Convex team sees this before I end up migrating the entire backend to something else.
In Conclusion…
I’m still grinding away at this. Still caching. Still querying. Still debugging.
But here’s the thing:
Convex is good. The folks who built it? Yeah, they helped scale Discord. That’s no small feat. This isn’t some random weekend project—it’s a serious, ambitious backend platform designed for modern apps.
But here’s the catch:
It looks simple. It feels magical. But it’s not easy.
If you’re going to build with Convex, you need to understand how it works under the hood. One wrong use of collect()
, a careless args{}
structure, or an unoptimized query—and boom, you’re stuck in debug purgatory like I was.
So, here’s my warning wrapped in love:
Convex is amazing—but not for noobs.
It’s a journey. One that rewards performance-focused devs who care about architecture. And if you’re coming from the land of classic SQL with PlanetScale or Microsoft SQL Server, you’ll feel the difference. Those platforms are built like tanks. Convex is more like a spaceship—you need to know what every button does before you launch.
So yes—use Convex. But use it wisely.
Until then…
Keep coding, nerds. Optimize everything. And may your cache never overflow.
💬 Join the Discussion
Share your thoughts and engage with the community